Geiser v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2023
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. Lydon · Cook v. State · Jerskey v. State · Jackson v. State · Carter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court has held that if offenses charged are separate and distinct either with respect to statutory definition, or, because they grow out of different transactions and different evidence is needed to prove each, then constitutional inhibition against double jeopardy is not applicable. Jerskey [v. State], 546 P.2d [173,] 186 [ (Wyo.1976) ] [ (citing ] Jackson v. State, 522 P.2d 1356, 1359 (Wyo.1974)) (emphasis added). Geiser committed two separate and distinct crimes and there can be no double jeopardy violation for convicting him of each crime. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is convict, ed of fraud by check involving two (2) or more checks issued within any sixty (60) day period in the state of Wyoming totaling five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more in the aggregate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the last check issued in Weston County was written within the same sixty-day period as the last check in Laramie County.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.