Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 920 P.2d 187 - State v. Clark

State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2014

13 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Woodson v. North Carolina · Lankford v. Idaho · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 103 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the accused of the penalty that may be imposed upon conviction of the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The State should be aware in light of Dearborn and Luvene that anything less than a punctilious approach toward the filing and service of the statutory notice in a death penalty case is a risky practice. Especially when the ultimate penalty is involved, this Court’s duty is to ensure the defendant receives every statutory protection the Legislature has provided. We will not condone sloppy practice in service of the notice under RCW 10.95.040.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “CR 5 provides the best guidance to the interpretation of RCW 10.95.090, as it pertains specifically to service of notices on counsel after commencement of an action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.