920 So. 2d 297 - Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 630 So. 2d 741 - Brown v. Drillers, Inc. · Moak v. American Automobile Insurance Company · 648 So. 2d 359 - Allen v. Allen · 525 So. 2d 223 - Fisk v. Mathews · 419 So. 2d 112 - Salling Wiping Cloth Co. v. Sewell, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“|/Transactions regulate only the differences which appear clearly to be comprehended in them by the intention of the parties, whether it be explained in a general or particular manner, unless it be the necessary consequence of what is expressed; and they do not extend to differences which the parties never intended to include in them. The renunciation, which is made therein to all rights, claims and pretensions, extends only to what relates to the differences on which the transaction arises.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lee v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.