920 So. 2d 528 - Dean v. Kavanaugh’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 515 So. 2d 1183 - Mullins v. Ratcliff · Madden v. Rhodes · 549 So. 2d 1309 - Bowers Window & Door Co. v. Dearman · 446 So. 2d 575 - Murray v. Laird · 446 So. 2d 1012 - Harris v. Sellers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[t]he participation of the beneficiary/grantee, or someone closely related to the beneficiary, arouses suspicious circumstances that negate independent action.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) whether one person has to be taken care of by another; (2) whether one person maintains a close relationship ■with another; (3) whether one person is provided transportation and has their medical care provided for by another; (4) whether one person maintains a joint account with another; (5) whether one is physically or mentally weak; (6) whether one is of advanced age or poor health; and (7) whether there exists a power of attorney between the one and [ ] another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.