Caldwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Delva · 852 So. 2d 226 - FB v. State · 124 So. 2d 481 - Brown v. State · 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · Stewart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This rule is founded on policy objectives that seek to eliminate legal trickery and procedural gamesmanship by crafty litigants who intentionally cause error or allow error to creep into the trial proceedings so they can complain about it on appeal. Equally important, the rule provides the trial court with a timely opportunity to correct the error and avoid mistrial or reversal on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if the inaccurately defined ... element is disputed and the inaccurate definition `is pertinent or material to what the jury must consider in order to convict'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. State“the error in the instruction relate[s] to an element of the crime that is a contested issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.