Payne v. State

Michael PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-02-10

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2018

3 state decisions

Relies on Brinson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *743 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Michael Payne appeals the order finding him in violation of probation. His sole issue on appeal is that the court failed to enter a written order stating which conditions the court found that he had violated. Payne is correct that such an order is necessary. Brinson v. State,866 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

¶5Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Payne's probation, but remand for the entry of a proper order.

¶6AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

¶7PLEUS, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.