920 So. 2d 900 - State v. Pulliam’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. United States · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 626 So. 2d 707 - State v. Tucker · 290 So. 2d 681 - State v. Paciera · State v. Pardon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), 820 So.2d 526 , the supreme court addressed whether the 2001 amendment to La.R.S. 14:98 should be applied to defendants who committed DWIs prior to the effective date of the 2001 amendment. The supreme court acknowledged that the prevailing jurisprudence adhered to the rule that the appropriate penalty provision is the penalty provision in effect at the time an offense is committed. The supreme court found, however, that the 2001 amendment to La.R.S. 14:98 should not adhere to the prevailing jurisprudence. Rather, the supreme court found that the 2001 amendment should apply to any defendant convicted after the amendment’s effective date.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.