Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

920 S.W.2d 128

State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-04-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2006

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1ORDER

¶2Kenyatta Williams (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction of first degree assault on a law enforcement officer, § 565.081.1, RSMo 1994, armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, and unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(4), RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion following an evidentiary hearing.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

/920/sw2d/128 · .json · Public domain