Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 920 S.W.2d 342 - Stevenson v. State

Stevenson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Vanderbilt v. Texas · Vanderbilt v. State · Murray v. State · Stevenson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The intoxilyzer instrument, in itself, cannot be a declarant. Because the intoxilyzer is not a declarant, the data it generates is not a statement and cannot be hearsay. The fact that the same data is ultimately printed in hard copy does not convert it into hearsay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.