Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 920 S.W.2d 704 - Arnold v. State

Arnold v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · William Marbury v. James Madison · United States v. Halper · Austin v. United States · Breed v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Texas and United States Constitutions bars a subsequent criminal prosecution of the same individual for driving while intoxicated. Id. at 426 (emphasis added) (license suspension under former article 6687b-1 now section 524.035 of the Transportation Code). On the same day it decided Voisinet , however, the Court held that the administrative suspension of a driver's license for refusing the test is not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “I want to make sure that this piece of legislation is an effective tool in removing the drunk driver off the road.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “having an alcohol concentration of 0.10 or more.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.