Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 F.2d 1310 - School Asbestos Litigation Kaiser Gypsum Company Inc v. Kelly School Asbestos Litigation United States Gypsum Company

School Asbestos Litigation Kaiser Gypsum Company Inc v. Kelly School Asbestos Litigation United States Gypsum Company’s Empirical Analysis

921 F.2d 1310 · 1990

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2017
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 14 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably Haines v. Liggett Group Inc. (1992), Kaiser Cement Corp. v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. (1991)

18 federal appellate · 14 district ·

450199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Permian Basin Area Rate Cases

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clear and indisputable lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the district court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is hornbook law, based on 66 years of Supreme Court precedent, that complete diversity is required only between the named plaintiffs and the named defendants in a federal class action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a writ of mandamus may appear more appropriate when the request is for an order mandating action, [while] a writ of prohibition may be more accurate when the request is to prohibit action,” but that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.