Klinghoffer v. Snc Achille Lauro Ed Altri-Gestione Motonave Achille Lauro in Amministrazione Straordinaria Chasser’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 149 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Fleet Data Processing Corp. v. Branch (In Re Bank of New England Corp.) (1998), Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd. (1996)
2 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,657 Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation, Leasco World Trade Company (u.k.) Ltd. v. Robert Maxwell, Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation, Leasco World Trade Company (u.k.) Limited v. Isidore Kerman · Brown v. Bullock · Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 149 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise ap-pealable under this section, shall be of the opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, he shall so state in writing in such order.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is clear that a question of law is `controlling' if reversal of the district court's order would terminate the action.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[O]nly exceptional circumstances will justify a departure from the basic policy of postponing appellate review until after the entry of judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.