Aiken v. Blodgett’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.2d 214 · 1990
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · Engle v. Isaac · Harris v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“were the same decibel level as his other responses to the officers' questions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“challenge ... the credibility of the officers' testimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“will [was] overborne and his capacity for self-determination critically impaired”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.