Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 F.2d 286 - Ward v. Rutherford

Ward v. Rutherford’s Empirical Analysis

921 F.2d 286 · 1990

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2025

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

1001990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 28 U.S.C. § 631 (Federal Magistrate Act of 1979) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · United States v. Raddatz · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor · Gomez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of the character of those preliminary examinations which take place every day in this country ... for the purpose of determining whether a case is made out which will justify the holding of the accused.” Similarly, the court in Hooker v. Klein, 573 F.2d 1360, 1366-68 (9th Cir.1978), observed that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[a]n extradition hearing ... is akin to a preliminary examination, a proceeding customarily handled by magistrates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “threaten the judicial branch with encroachment by a coordinate branch of government”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.