Ramseur v. Beyer’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.2d 504 · 1990
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2016
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brody v. Guercio · Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Larson · Steven Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40 · Scarpa v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under FRAP 4(b) reviewed for abuse of discretion). 14 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) provides: 15 The district court, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal upon motion filed not later than 30 days after the expiration of the time prescribed by this Rule 4(a) [i.e., not later than 30 days after date of entry of the judgment or order appealed from]. 16 Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5) (emphasis added). FRAP 4(a) originally empowered the district court to extend the time to file a notice of appeal only upon a showing of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pontarelli v. Stone“`Rule 4(a)(5) . . . require(s) a finding of excusable neglect in those instances where the court, after weighing the relevant considerations, is satisfied that counsel has exhibited substantial diligence, professional competence and has acted in good faith to conform his or her conduct in accordance with the rule.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of Federal Rules may, in some situations, meet the requirements of excusable neglect under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5), Agents' counsel's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.