United States v. Garza’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.2d 59 · 1991
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably United States v. Sweeten (1991), United States v. Kaplansky (1994)
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Taylor v. United States · Sedillo v. United States · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the charging papers, the indictments, clearly reflect that [the] prior burglary convictions meet Taylor's generic burglary definition.” Id. at 61. Even though the holding in Garza appears to disregard Taylor’s conjunctive”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“absence of jury instructions in a guilty plea setting does not negate the application of the second half of Taylor 's generic burglary rubric”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.