Crum v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.2d 642 · 1990
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Howard v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1991), Key v. Callahan (1997)
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 421 (§ 221 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Garner v. Heckler · Mullen v. Bowen · United States v. Brawner · Houston v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is charged with the duty to weigh the evidence [and] to resolve material conflicts in the testimony.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n initial determination under subsection (a), (c), (g), or (i) of this section that an individual is not under a disability, in any case where there is evidence which indicates the existence of a mental impairment, shall be made only if the Commissioner of Social Security has made every reasonable effort to ensure that a qualified psychiatrist or psychologist has completed the medical portion of the case review and any applicable residual functional capacity assessment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Birnell v. Apfel“See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 , 401 (1971). Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. See Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197 , 229 (1938). Substantial evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.