U.S. v. Corbett’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.3d 1032 · 2019
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 42 U.S.C. § 1320D (§ 1177 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Gall v. United States · Smith v. United States · Molina-Martinez v. United States · Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance · Rosales-Mireles v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish plain error, 'there must be an error that has not been intentionally relinquished or abandoned'; 'the error must be plain-that is to say, clear or obvious'; and 'the error must have affected the defendant's substantial rights,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If these conditions are met, we 'should exercise our discretion to correct the forfeited error if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'a reasonable probability that, but for the error, the outcome of the proceeding would have been different.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.