Smith v. Allbaugh’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.3d 1261 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · United States v. Frady · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the state court declined to consider the merits of that claim based 'on independent and adequate state procedural grounds.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eaton v. Pacheco“[A] court may excuse a procedural default 'if a petitioner can”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eaton v. Pacheco“prejudice arising 'from the errors' that form the basis of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eaton v. Pacheco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.