U.S. v. Tull-Abreu’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.3d 294 · 2019
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Crawford v. Washington · Johnson v. United States · United States v. Zannino · Michigan v. Bryant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“denial of a Rule 33 motion for manifest abuse of discretion with the respect due to the presider's sense of the ebb and flow of the recently concluded trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.