U.S. v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.3d 452 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Neder v. United States · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd · 131 S. Ct. 2060 - Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A. · United States v. Akpan · United States v. Lara-Velasquez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.