U.S. v. Chaney’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.3d 572 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1035 (§ 244 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 856 (§ 416 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Rita v. United States · Sells v. United States · Andresen v. Maryland · Groh v. Ramirez · United States v. Santos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.