United States v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
921 F.3d 82 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1038 · 18 U.S.C. § 2261A · 18 U.S.C. § 2265 (§ 40221 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 2266 (§ 40221 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on United States v. Cavera · Molina-Martinez v. United States · Norton v. Sam's Club · United States v. Jass · 137 S. Ct. 1549 - BNSF R. Co. v. Tyrrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Contempt proceedings may move forward upon a showing of actual notice, but only as long as the court making the contempt finding already has personal jurisdiction over the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.