Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 FSUPP 1072 - Sequa Capital Corp. v. Nave

Sequa Capital Corp. v. Nave’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Wrenn v. Weinberger · Marathon Oil Co. v. United States · United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc. · Republic of Philippines v. Marcos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any court, before a judgment is entered, upon motion of the party in whose favor a verdict or decision has been rendered, the trial judge may order examination of the adverse party and order him restrained with the same effect as if a restraining notice had been served upon him after judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is designed to secure satisfaction of the judgment ultimately to be entered in the action .... [and] has substantially the same effect as an attachment and seizure of property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Other than having received a favorable verdict or decision, there are no prerequisites to obtaining the relief provided in CPLR [§] 5229.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.