Marshall v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6321 (Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966) · 26 U.S.C. § 6331 · 26 U.S.C. § 6335 · 26 U.S.C. § 6337 · 26 U.S.C. § 6502 · 26 U.S.C. § 6532 · 26 U.S.C. § 7403 · 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Relies on Aquilino v. United States · United States v. National Bank of Commerce · United States v. Rodgers · Zurcher v. Stanford Daily · Wetherell v. De Grandy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To hold that one spouse could deprive the other spouse of this interest by recording a deed after having unilaterally and wrongfully sold the homestead would defeat [the purpose of the homestead law, which is to create a property interest that could not be conveyed without the consent of both spouses]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a severance of a joint tenancy pursuant to section 500.19,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.