Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 FSUPP 82 - Doe v. Indian Mountain School, Inc.

Doe v. Indian Mountain School, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp. · Roberts v. Caton · Almonte v. New York Medical College

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the legislature wanted to preclude application of the extended limitations period to all the types of claims enumerated in § 52-584, notwithstanding its objective of providing meaningful remedies to minor victims of sexual abuse, it probably would have said so explicitly, as it has in establishing other statutes of limitations. See [General Statutes § 52-576 (c) ('[t]he provisions of this section [relating to actions for an account or on any simple or implied contract] shall not apply ... to any cause of action governed by article 2 of title 42a'); General Statutes § 52-581 (b) ('[t]his section [relating to actions on oral contracts] shall not apply to causes of action governed by article 2 of title 42a'].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “§ 52-577d expressly provides that [General Statutes] § 52-577, which applies to intentional torts, does not apply to claims involving personal injury to a minor caused by sexual abuse, [whereas] § 52-577d makes no mention of § 52-584, which applies to claims of personal injury arising from negligence or recklessness ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he introductory clause of § 52-577d, by referring to ... § 52-577 without referring to ... § 52-584, tends to create some ambiguity concerning the statute's scope”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.