Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 N.E.2d 1288 - King v. State

King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union · Zickefoose v. State · Aplin v. State · King v. State · Gibbs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who knowingly or intentionally: (1)disseminates matter to minors that is harmful to minors; ⅜ * * * * commits a Class D felony. (b) This section does not apply if a person disseminates, displays, or makes available the matter described in subsection (a) through the Internet, computer electronic transfer, or a computer network unless: (1) the matter is obscene under IC 35-49-2-1; (2) the matter is child pornography under IC 35-42-4-4; or (3) the person distributes the matter to a child less than eighteen (18) years of age believing or intending that the recipient is a child less than eighteen (18) years of age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.