Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reaves v. State · Chanley v. State · Shouse v. State · Ford v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that there is no right to serve concurrent sentences for different crimes in the absence of a statute so providing, and that concurrent sentences may be ordered only when they are to be served at the same institution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Perry has failed to cite and we have found no controlling precedent authorizing an Indiana court to order a sentence to run concurrent with a sentence being served in another state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Moreover, a defendant is not even entitled to credit on his Indiana sentence while he is incarcerated in another jurisdiction for a totally different offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.