Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 N.E.2d 880 - Myers v. Yoder

Myers v. Yoder’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. · Mullin v. Municipal City of South Bend · Filip v. Block · 174 Ind. App. 123 - Bulla v. Donahue · Trotter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Factors demonstrating the existence of a special relationship between the agent and insured include whether the agent: 1) exercised broad discretion in servicing the insured’s needs; 2) counseled the insured concerning specialized insurance coverage; 3) held himself out as a highly-skilled insurance expert; or 4) received compensation for the expert advice provided above the customary premium paid. While the question of whether the relationship gives rise to such a duty may involve questions of fact, whether an insurance agent owes the insured a duty to advise based on undisputed facts is a question of law for the court. The burden of establishing an intimate long-term relationship or other special circumstance is on the insured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the rule w[ere] otherwise and the responsibility of determining and calculating the proper amount of ... insurance w[ere] shifted to the insurance companies and its agents, it is likely that a raft of litigation would ensue whenever coverage miscalculations occurred. Thus, the cost of ... insurance coverage would rise and those costs would undoubtedly be passed on to the consumer. In light of these concerns, there is no justification for imposing such a sweeping duty on insurance agents and/or their companies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.