Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 P.2d 1021 - State v. Moss

State v. Moss’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2024

13 state decisions

501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Wade v. Hunter · Ohio v. Johnson · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly · Juidice v. Vail

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o establish undue prejudice[,] a defendant must show that he or she has taken some affirmative action which would materially and substantially affect the outcome of a subsequent retrial. Where the defendant is simply placed in the same position as he or she was prior to the guilty plea, there is no undue prejudice to the defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a plea in abeyance is not a final adjudication”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “analogize[d] judicial abortion of a previously accepted guilty plea and plea bargain to judicial declaration of a mistrial after jeopardy has attached-Le., to hold that jeopardy attaches upon acceptance of the guilty plea, but to allow the district court to rescind acceptance at any time before sentencing and judgment upon a showing of 'manifest necessity, the standard for declaring a mistrial over the defendant's objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.