Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 P.2d 51 - People v. Olson

People v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2015

20 state decisions

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Halper · Austin v. United States · Helvering v. Mitchell · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch · Helvering v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The purposes of this section are: (a) To provide safety for all persons using the highways of this state by quickly revoking the driver’s license of any person who has shown himself to be a safety hazard by driving with an excessive amount of alcohol in his body and any person who has refused to submit to an analysis.... [[Image here]] (c) Following the revocation period, to prevent the relicensing of any person until ... he no longer constitutes a safety hazard to other highway users.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Deutschendorf v. People
  2. “Whether double jeopardy bars a second proceeding requires a particularized assessment of the penalty imposed and the purposes that the penalty may fairly be said to serve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Woodrow v. Wildlife Commission
  3. “The record need not be all-inclu sive; rather, it will be deemed adequate if it contains sufficient information to enable the court to resolve the issues presented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. People ex rel. M.C.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.