State v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably State v. Michielli (1997), City of Seattle v. Guay (2003)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Patterson v. United States · 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a long and unnecessary delay occurs in bringing a defendant who is amenable to process before the court, CrR 3.3's 90-day trial period is deemed to commence at the time the information was filed....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Huffmeyer · State v. King“Additionally, any delay caused by the defendant's fault or connivance is also excluded from the time for trial calculation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“periods during which the prosecution acts in good faith and with due diligence in attempting to bring the defendant before the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chenoweth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.