921 So. 2d 1066 - State v. Hooker’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Shapiro · 796 So. 2d 649 - State v. Neal · 772 So. 2d 78 - State v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person ... who is in possession of any document required by R.S. 32:412(1) 2 or R.S. 40:1321(J) 3 that has been altered with the intent to defraud, or who is in' possession of a counterfeit of any document required by R.S. 32:412(1) or R.S. 40:1321(J), shall, on a first conviction, be fined not more than one thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than two years nor more than ten years without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gillum“whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.