921 So. 2d 288 - Garrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barnes v. State · Weathersby v. State · Conner v. State · 877 So. 2d 1254 - Lynch v. State · 481 So. 2d 793 - MacK v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] circumstantial-evidence case is one where the State is 'without a confession and wholly without eyewitnesses to the gravamen of the offense charged.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]here the defendant or the defendant’s witnesses are the only eyewitnesses to the homicide, their version, if reasonable, must be accepted as true, unless substantially contradicted in material particulars by a credible witness or witnesses for the [SJtate, or by the physical facts or by the facts of common knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DOUGALEWICZ v. State“defendant is not entitled to a circumstantial evidence instruction where both circumstantial and direct evidence are admitted at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.