921 So. 2d 292 - Spicer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
110
cited by 110 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
108 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Wong Sun v. United States · Ring v. Arizona · Wainwright v. Witt · Alderman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It must be clear beyond a reasonable doubt, that absent the prosecutor's comments, the jury could have found the defendant guilty.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Moss v. State · McCoy v. State“The Court does not single out any instruction or take instructions out of context; rather, the instructions are to be read together as a whole. A defendant is entitled to have jury instructions given which present his theory of the case. This entitlement is limited, however, in that the Court is allowed to refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Booker v. State · McCune v. State“Failure to make a contemporaneous objection waives an issue for purposes of appeal.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.