921 So. 2d 490 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to present evidence that would open the door to damaging cross-examination and rebuttal evidence that would counter any value that might be gained from the evidence.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Overton v. State · Davis v. State

2. “(1) that the evidence at issue is favorable to him, either because it is exculpatory or because it is impeaching; (2) that the evidence was suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently; and (3) that the suppression resulted in prejudice.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 941 So. 2d 1073 - Ponticelli v. State · 980 So. 2d 451 - Tompkins v. State

3. “[Florida Supreme Court] and the United States Supreme Court have held that police officers are permitted to falsely inform suspects regarding the evidence they have against them”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 936 So. 2d 1111 - State v. Pitts