Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 921 SO2D 746 - State v. L.J.T.

State v. L.J.T.’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 445 So. 2d 605 - State v. Del Gaudio · 546 So. 2d 20 - State v. SMF · CD v. State · 899 So. 2d 1176 - State v. Carpenter · 622 So. 2d 174 - State v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]ismissal is an extreme sanction that should be employed only when lesser sanctions would not achieve the desired result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.