Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

921 So. 2d 779

Bango v. Crosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-02-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2007

1 state decisions

Relies on Forbes v. Crosby

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-02-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. As the circuit court entered its order without affording petitioner time to file his reply to the Department’s response, we quash the order of the circuit court. This case is hereby remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. See Forbes v. Crosby, 866 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). In light of this disposition, we decline to address the correctness of the circuit court’s decision at this time.

¶2PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ERVIN, WOLF and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
/921/so2d/779 · .json · Public domain