921 So. 2d 864 - Crews v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Purkett v. Elem · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Melbourne v. State · 522 So. 2d 18 - State v. Slappy · 560 So. 2d 203 - Reed v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) once a proper objection to the challenge has been made, the trial court must ask the proponent of the challenge to explain his reason for making the strike; (2) the burden of production then shifts to the proponent to come forward with a race-neutral reason; (3) if the explanation is facially race-neutral and the court believes that, given all the circumstances surrounding the strike, the explanation is not a pretext, the strike will be sustained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glinton v. State“[w]hen examined in a vacuum the example of an immoral law given by the juror cannot be deemed race-neutral. However, when taken in context, it is clear that the juror indicated he may not follow a particular law if he did not find it moral. The state demonstrated this through its explanation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glinton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.