United States v. Dyer’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.2d 105 · 1990
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2021
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · Badaracco v. Commissioner · United States v. Park · United States v. Pomponio · United States v. Bishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] jury charge must be viewed as a whole and in the context of the entire trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.