Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 F.2d 1456 - Dixon v. Richer

Dixon v. Richer’s Empirical Analysis

922 F.2d 1456 · 1991

Citation profile

182
cited by 182 later decisions
6
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

80 federal appellate · 46 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 182 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Hinton v. City of Elwood (1993), Ernest Medina v. Michael Cram - Ralph Bruning City of Colorado Springs Loren Kramer (2001)

80 federal appellate · 46 district · 7 state decisions

12401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Bell v. Wolfish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 182 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “had already been frisked, had his hands up against the van with his back to the officers, and was not making any aggressive moves or threats”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “For plaintiffs to defeat a claim of qualified immunity, the 'contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.