Turner v. Armontrout’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.2d 492 · 1991
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2016
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · United Families of America v. Kendrick · Nicholas v. United States · Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appeal[s] by Permission,” states that in cases where the appeal is within a court of appeals' discretion, ''[a] notice of appeal need not be filed. The date when the order granting permission to appeal is entered serves as the date of the notice of appeal for calculating time under these rules.” Fed. R.App. P. 5(d)(2). While not basing our decision on Rule 5, we have held that a pro se application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal a denial of a habeas petition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pierson v. Dormire“filed within Rule 4’s time limit ... [is] the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal” if it fulfills Rule 3’s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pierson v. Dormire“[s]ubject matter jurisdiction ... is a threshold requirement which must be assured”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.