Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 F.2d 584 - United States v. Rascon

United States v. Rascon’s Empirical Analysis

922 F.2d 584 · 1990

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
3
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Martinez-Fuerte · Smith v. Maryland · United States v. Arango

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there was a complete absence of evidence concerning Avita's possession of the car. Thus, . . . the defendant failed to at least state that he had gained possession from the owner or someone with the authority to grant possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]o presume that Avita's possession of car was legitimate in the absence of any such evidence would be inconsistent with the burden of proof on this issue, which lies with the proponent of a motion to suppress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is immaterial if evidence sought to be introduced against a defendant was obtained in violation of someone else’s Fourth Amendment rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.