Western Real Estate Fund Inc Landsing Diversified Properties-II v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.2d 592 · 1990
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 14 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 132 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Zale Corporation Feld v. Zale Corporation (1995), Rummel v. Lexington Insurance (1997)
17 federal appellate · 14 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Penson v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not affect the liability of any other entity on [the debtor's] debt,”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] bankruptcy court's supplementary equitable powers [under § 105(a) ] may not be exercised in a manner that is inconsistent with the other, more specific provisions of the Code.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title. No provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.