Schnabel v. Wells’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.2d 726 · 1991
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Hayes v. Lockhart · In re Disbarment of Schaefer · In re Disbarment of McManus · Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc. · Norlock v. City of Garland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““... by mailing a copy of the summons and of the complaint (by first-class mail, postage prepaid) to the person to be served, together with two copies of a notice and acknowledgment conforming substantially to form 18-A and a return envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the sender.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“dismissal without prejudice was mandated by Rule 4(j)) (all emphasis added). 3 Despite finding a clear Rule 4(j) violation, the district court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'if the proper person receives the notice but fails to return the acknowledgment form, another method of service authorized by law is required.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.