Gingras v. Think Fin., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.3d 112 · 2019
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.