U.S. v. Harun’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.3d 129 · 2019
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 2332 · 18 U.S.C. § 2332F · 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (§ 303 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 844
Relies on Faretta v. California · McKaskle v. Wiggins · United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez · United States v. Schmidt · United States v. Kassar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prevented the court from assessing his purported waiver by refusing to answer any questions meant to assess his understanding of the risks of self-representation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.