Ruano v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.3d 346 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Jie Lin v. Ashcroft · Gebremichael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Hernandez-Avalos v. Lynch · Moab v. Gonzales · Cece v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“relationship to his wife was the reason he, and not someone else, was targeted”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the gang members' demands leveraged her maternal authority to control her son's activities,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.