Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 F.3d 406 - Smith v. Seeco, Inc.

Smith v. Seeco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

922 F.3d 406 · 2019

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Marsh · Greer v. Miller · Hall v. United States · Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp. · Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. Vela

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]bsent a close question and lack of state sources enabling a nonconjectural determination, a federal court should not avoid its responsibility to determine all issues before it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.