Robare Group, Ltd. v. S.E.C.’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.3d 468 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78D (§ 4a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 80B · 15 U.S.C. § 80B · 15 U.S.C. § 80B · 15 U.S.C. § 80B · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Pierce v. Underwood · Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Securities and Exchange Commission has long held that '[f]ailure by an investment adviser to disclose potential conflicts of interest to its clients constitutes fraud within the meaning of Sections 206(1) and (2),'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'scalping' . . . 'operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client' within the meaning of the [Investment Advisers] Act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.